Modular Architectures Redefining Modern PLC Development


By LamXutai
3 min read

industrial automation PLC

Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) remain the backbone of industrial automation, powering everything from factory machinery to large-scale process control systems. However, traditional PLC development is increasingly strained by monolithic codebases, high maintenance demands, and limited scalability. Inspired by successful software paradigms like microservices, modular architectures are now gaining momentum in the realm of industrial automation. By breaking down complex systems into independent, reusable modules, this approach is transforming the way PLCs are developed, maintained, and scaled.

Modular architecture refers to the decomposition of a system into standalone functional units. These modules are highly cohesive with well-defined responsibilities, loosely coupled to minimize dependencies, and communicate through standardized interfaces. In PLC development, this concept is embodied through pluggable I/O modules, function blocks, user-defined data types, and the use of standard communication protocols like OPC UA.

The advantages of this approach are clear. Code reuse increases significantly, with platforms like Siemens TIA Portal boosting efficiency by over 50%. Modular systems also enable parallel development, reducing project timelines. Maintenance is simplified as modules can be individually debugged and updated. An automotive plant, for example, cut downtime by 30% using a modular approach. Scalability is another major benefit—new hardware and features can be added without overhauling existing systems. A packaging line doubled its output by integrating extra sensors and actuators seamlessly.

To implement modular PLC development, both hardware and software must support modularity. Controllers like Beckhoff's CX series allow hot-swapping. Software development under IEC 61131-3 promotes modular coding with function and organizational blocks. Platforms like Studio 5000 support modular programming with Add-On Instructions (AOIs). Version control systems like Git are increasingly integrated with PLC IDEs such as CODESYS for efficient module management. Communication protocols also play a key role. OPC UA ensures interoperable, cross-platform data exchange, while REST APIs, like those used in B&R’s mapp technology, facilitate integration with edge devices.

Despite the benefits, challenges exist. Protocol incompatibilities can be mitigated using standards like MQTT Sparkplug. Integration complexity requires techniques like dependency injection and middleware solutions such as Kepware. On the organizational side, transitioning from linear to modular programming demands a shift in mindset and skillsets. Companies that invest in training can see significant productivity gains—up to 40% in some cases.

Real-world applications underline the value of modular PLCs. In the automotive industry, modular code enabled a manufacturer to switch production lines in 30 minutes instead of 8 hours. In renewable energy, modular inverters reduced development time by 60% and failure rates by 25%. In water treatment, modular systems improved coordination and cut energy and maintenance costs by 18% and 35%, respectively.

Looking forward, modularity will integrate closely with digital twin technology, where each module has a virtual counterpart for real-time testing. AI will further enhance modular systems by enabling self-optimizing modules. Low-code platforms like Advantech’s WebAccess HMI are making modular design accessible, allowing engineers to assemble systems with drag-and-drop tools.

In conclusion, modular architecture is more than a technical upgrade—it’s a new paradigm for industrial design. Companies must adopt it strategically, aligning modularity with smart and connected systems to lead in the era of intelligent automation.